In most cases, arresting citizens comes as a shock to those convicted of a criminal crime. When the person realises that they are innocent, their first reaction would be to start talking and attempt and persuade the officer that a mistake has occurred. This could be the worst thing a person can do to protect themselves. In seeking a good criminal defence attorney, let’s take a look at some points to inquire about.Learn more by visiting JacksonWhite Law
Your rights, which include having the right to remain silent, should be read during the arrest process. Meet such guidelines. At this time, the only thing you can say is to remind law enforcement that you are permitted to make a phone call, then call someone who will find you an attorney. Prior to being able to determine which lawyer to use, it can take many phone calls.
There is an arraignment period during which you can read the formal charges against you. It’s important that you have a lawyer there to talk and defend you in court on your behalf. Now is not the time to start talking to you. Let your counsel speak and petition the court for the amount of bail to be set.
The phase of discovery is where the lawyer is able to find out what evidence against you is already collected, and a list of witnesses, if any. Then the defence begins by trying to locate facts that contradicts the current proof. This will include taking testimony, depositions, and questioning other witnesses who may be able to show that at the time it took place, you were not anywhere near the scene of the crime.
Jury selection is made to select up to 12 persons to hear the case and decide if they believe you are guilty. Any of the options of questions that are in your best interest will be countered by the lawyer you have selected, and then either approve or reject them based on the responses, and sometimes the opinions, of the people being screened.
You will be expected to be there on time and in person when the trial starts. The defendant may be physically unable to appear in court in some cases. These cases will be referred to the judge who will decide whether allowing the trial to proceed without them being in the courtroom is in the best interest of the wellbeing of the accused.